Should the drug industry work with key opinion leaders? Yes

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39541.702870.59 (Published 19 June 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:1404

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Charlie Buckwell, chief executive
  1. 1 Complete Medical Group, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 1AQ
  1. Charlie.Buckwell{at}complete-grp.com

    Industry commonly works with experts to put across its message. Charlie Buckwell believes that such interaction is essential for medical advancement, but Giovanni Fava (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39541.731493.59) argues that it risks scientific integrity

    This question is a microcosm of the broader debate about how the drug industry and clinicians should interact. It leads to two tempting but indefensible end points—either that doctors are immune to marketing and should be free to do as they wish with industry or that industry is inherently corrupting, making all contact with it unethical.1

    Both positions are flawed, and the reality is much more complex: neither medicine nor industry can realise their true value independently of one another.1 Both have a role in the advancement and delivery of health care. It is not in the interest of the industry to have its products used incorrectly or in the wrong patients, and there are appreciable benefits to healthcare professionals from interactions between industry and opinion leaders.

    Current practice

    The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations has a clear position on the ethical promotion of prescription medicines. It seeks “to preserve the independence of decisions taken by healthcare …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL