- Angela Cooper, senior health services research fellow,
- Norma O’Flynn, clinical director
- on behalf of the Guideline Development Group
- 1National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, Royal College of General Practitioners, London SW7 1PU
- Correspondence to: N O’Flynn noflynn{at}rcgp.org.uk
Why read this summary?
Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United Kingdom. Randomised controlled trials have shown benefit from modifying risk factors in people at risk of developing cardiovascular disease and in those who have evidence of established disease. Currently patients are often assessed opportunistically and treated on the basis of individual clinical or laboratory results rather than on their overall level of risk of developing cardiovascular disease. This article summarises the most recent recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the effective identification and assessment of people at risk of cardiovascular disease, and on the modification of lipids in primary and secondary prevention. The detailed consideration of the evidence is available in the full guideline (www.nice.org.uk/ CG67).1
Recommendations
NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the guideline development group’s opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets.
Identifying those at risk of cardiovascular disease for primary prevention
Use a systematic strategy rather than opportunistic assessment to identify people at high risk of the disease.
Exclude patients known to have established cardiovascular disease or who are already considered at high risk, such as patients with diabetes or lipid disorders.
Estimate risk of cardiovascular disease using risk factors already recorded in primary care records, such as age, sex, and blood pressure.
Use the estimated risk value to prioritise patients, and arrange a full formal risk assessment for patients whose estimated 10 year risk is ≥20%.[These first four recommendations are based on results from health economic modelling]
Assess risk (both estimate and formally) using the 1991 Framingham 10 year risk equations, with the following variables: age (30-74 years), sex, systolic blood pressure (mean of previous two systolic readings), total cholesterol …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012