- Nigel Hawkes, health editor
- 1the Times
- nigel.hawkes{at}thetimes.co.uk
Primary care, for so long denied the pleasures of NHS reorganisation, is finally facing a showdown. At risk is the deal under which primary care is supplied by general practitioners (GPs), who combine public service and private entrepreneurship within a protected market.
The private sector is being invited to tender for polyclinics and for primary care services across England. GPs complain that these changes have been sprung on them with little warning. Who voted for polyclinics, they ask, or for open tendering for primary care services and the awarding of contracts to private companies? GPs feel that they have been sandbagged by a reform that lacks political legitimacy or an evidence base.
The British Medical Association has launched a Support your Surgery campaign, while Ara Darzi, the health minister, has promised local people involvement and consultation in any changes to their services.1 But this promise has been made when the changes are already under way.
Lord Darzi’s principles are positive (box), says Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the BMA Council. “In fact they’re impossible to disagree with. Of course it’s right that changes should always be to the benefit of patients, that they should be evidence based, and that local populations should have a meaningful say over their NHS services. The problem is that the public and healthcare staff alike have yet to see much evidence of these principles being delivered up to now.”
Lord Darzi’s five pledges on change in the NHS2
1. Change will always be to the benefit of patients. This means that change will improve the quality of care that patients receive, whether in terms of clinical outcomes, experiences, or safety
2. Change will be clinically driven. We will ensure …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012