- Clare Dyer
- 1BMJ
The hopes of people with mild Alzheimer’s disease of having access to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors through the NHS were boosted last week when three appeal court judges ruled that a key step in the process for appraising the drugs for NHS use was “procedurally unfair.”
The court unanimously overturned a High Court ruling that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) acted fairly when it refused to supply the drug company Eisai with a full version of the computer model it used to decide that the treatment would not be cost effective for the early stages of the illness (BMJ 2007;335:319; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39307.630347.DB).
The drugs cost £2.50 (€3.17; …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27