Editor’s Choice

What our advisory board can, and can’t, tell us

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39574.574676.47 (Published 8 May 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:7652

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
  1. fgodlee{at}bmj.com

    Since the BMJ set up its editorial advisory board in 1997, a rolling cast of medicine’s finest has been on hand to support and challenge the journal (http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/about-bmj/editorial-advisory-board). Each year when we gather in London for the annual meeting, as we did last week, the personalities, expertise, and advice are subtly different. This year for the first time, the meeting included editors in chief of the BMJ’s 26 sister journals (http://group.bmj.com/products/journals), bringing not only knowledge of their own discipline but an instinct for what journals can and can’t do.

    The discussion was as inspiring and wide ranging as ever: the global …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL