- Susan M Phillips, director1,
- Martin Gallagher, research fellow2,
- Heather Buchan, advisor3
- 1Research Implementation Program, National Institute of Clinical Studies, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, VC 3004 Australia
- 2George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
- 3National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne
- Correspondence to: S M Phillips sue.phillips{at}nhmrc.gov.au
The clinical problem
The overall risk of deep vein thrombosis is higher than 20% after major surgery and higher than 40% in patients having major orthopaedic surgery.1 The level of risk for individual patients depends on their clinical condition and the nature of the operation. Although a deep vein thrombosis may be asymptomatic, it will often give rise to long term morbidity, and there is potential for pulmonary embolism and sudden death. Graduated compression stockings are effective in decreasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, either alone or in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis in high risk patients. Both forms of prophylaxis are used suboptimally in clinical settings.2 Graduated compression stockings should be used routinely for surgical inpatients.
Key points
Graduated compression stockings are effective in reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients, either alone or in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis in patients at higher risk
The advantage of stockings in surgical settings is that they do not increase the risk of bleeding, but they should not be used in patients with peripheral arterial disease
All hospitals should have thromboprophylaxis policies that clarify who is responsible for assessing and managing the risk of deep vein thrombosis in admitted patients
All patients admitted to hospital for surgery should have their risk assessed, and “at risk” patients should wear graduated compression stockings from admission until they return to their usual level of mobility
The evidence for change
The most recent review of the evidence was …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012