- Susan M Phillips, director1,
- Martin Gallagher, research fellow2,
- Heather Buchan, advisor3
- 1Research Implementation Program, National Institute of Clinical Studies, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, VC 3004 Australia
- 2George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
- 3National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne
- Correspondence to: S M Phillips sue.phillips{at}nhmrc.gov.au
The clinical problem
The overall risk of deep vein thrombosis is higher than 20% after major surgery and higher than 40% in patients having major orthopaedic surgery.1 The level of risk for individual patients depends on their clinical condition and the nature of the operation. Although a deep vein thrombosis may be asymptomatic, it will often give rise to long term morbidity, and there is potential for pulmonary embolism and sudden death. Graduated compression stockings are effective in decreasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, either alone or in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis in high risk patients. Both forms of prophylaxis are used suboptimally in clinical settings.2 Graduated compression stockings should be used routinely for surgical inpatients.
Key points
Graduated compression stockings are effective in reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients, either alone or in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis in patients at higher risk
The advantage of stockings in surgical settings is that they do not increase the risk of bleeding, but they should not be used in patients with peripheral arterial disease
All hospitals should have thromboprophylaxis policies that clarify who is responsible for assessing and managing the risk of deep vein thrombosis in admitted patients
All patients admitted to hospital for surgery should have their risk assessed, and “at risk” patients should wear graduated compression stockings from admission until they return to their usual level of mobility
The evidence for change
The most recent review of the evidence was …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27