Head to Head

Should we screen for abdominal aortic aneurysm? Yes

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39517.443796.AD (Published 17 April 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:862

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Stephen Brearley, consultant general and vascular surgeon
  1. 1Whipps Cross University Hospital, London E11 1NR
  1. vascusurg{at}btconnect.com

    In January, the government announced five pilot screening programmes for aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 in England. Stephen Brearley describes the rationale for this proposal while James Johnson (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39514.494167.AD) argues that it is not without pitfalls

    Around 5% of men aged between 65 and 74 have abdominal aortic aneurysms (maximum infrarenal aortic diameter of at least 3 cm).1 The prevalence is some six times lower in women. Aneurysms expand inexorably2 without causing symptoms until they rupture or the individual dies of another cause. When rupture occurs, barely half of the patients reach hospital alive.3 Of those who do, 40-60% do not survive to discharge, giving an overall mortality for ruptured aortic aneurysm in the region of 80%. Nearly 5000 people die of this condition each year in England and Wales.4

    Some aneurysms are diagnosed before rupture occurs, but at present this is largely fortuitous. Conventional open repair of unruptured aneurysms below the renal arteries (95% of the total) carries a mean mortality of 9.5%,5 …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular