- Iona Heath, general practitioner, London
- iona.heath{at}dsl.pipex.com
We are fast approaching the 30th anniversary of the World Health Organization’s Alma Ata declaration, which set the aspirational target of “Health for all by the year 2000” (BMJ 2008;336:536-8, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39469.432118.AD). The reasoning, laid out in the declaration’s article 10, was that “an acceptable level of health for all the people of the world by the year 2000 can be attained through a fuller and better use of the world’s resources, a considerable part of which is now spent on armaments and military conflicts.” Tragically, since 1978, spending on war and armaments has continued unabated, while the Alma Ata target came nowhere close to realisation and has since been replaced by the United Nations’ eight millennium development goals, with a new target date of 2015. It is frighteningly clear that this sequence is in danger of degenerating into an elaborate ritual, which provides the illusion of activity for the richer countries of the world while making little difference to the realities of daily life for the world’s poorest and most marginalised people.
The …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27