Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39518.463206.25 (Published 10 April 2008)
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:816
  1. Kirstin Finning, clinical scientist1,
  2. Pete Martin, clinical scientist1,
  3. Joanna Summers, biomedical scientist1,
  4. Edwin Massey, consultant haematologist1,
  5. Geoff Poole, head of red cell immunohaematology2,
  6. Geoff Daniels, head of molecular diagnostics1
  1. 1International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol BS10 5ND
  2. 2NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol
  1. Correspondence to: G Daniels geoff.daniels{at}nbs.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 25 February 2008

Abstract

Objectives To assess the feasibility of applying a high throughput method, with an automated robotic technique, for predicting fetal RhD phenotype from fetal DNA in the plasma of RhD negative pregnant women to avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-RhD immunoglobulin.

Design Prospective comparison of fetal RHD genotype determined from fetal DNA in maternal plasma with the serologically determined fetal RhD phenotype from cord blood.

Setting Antenatal clinics and antenatal testing laboratories in the Midlands and north of England and an international blood group reference laboratory.

Participants Pregnant women of known gestation identified as RhD negative by an antenatal testing laboratory. Samples from 1997 women were taken at or before the 28 week antenatal visit.

Main outcome measures Detection rate of fetal RhD from maternal plasma, error rate, false positive rate, and the odds of being affected given a positive result.

Results Serologically determined RhD phenotypes were obtained from 1869 cord blood samples. In 95.7% (n=1788) the correct fetal RhD phenotype was predicted by the genotyping tests. In 3.4% (n=64) results were either unobtainable or inconclusive. A false positive result was obtained in 0.8% (14 samples), probably because of unexpressed or weakly expressed fetal RHD genes. In only three samples (0.2%) were false negative results obtained. If these results had been applied as a guide to treatment, only 2% of the women would have received anti-RhD unnecessarily, compared with 38% without the genotyping.

Conclusions High throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses in all RhD negative women is feasible and would substantially reduce unnecessary administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin to RhD negative pregnant women with an RhD negative fetus.

Footnotes

  • We thank the many pregnant women who took part in this study. We are also grateful to Ian Skidmore, Craig Wilkes, Richard Mason, and other managers and staff in the red cell immunohaematology laboratories of the National Blood Service, the staff of the hospital trusts in the Birmingham, Sheffield, and Oxford regions, and Helen Williams, Maggie Pailing, and Sue Cotton of the National Blood Service Hospital liaison team for their advice. Michael Spratt, research statistician of the University of Bristol, provided valuable statistical input into the design of the study, and Ian Franklin, Ann Gooch, and Frank Boulton assisted with the manuscript.

  • Contributors: All authors participated in the study design, study implementation, and interpretation of the results. GD is guarantor.

  • Funding: KF, PM, JS, and GD were supported by the UK Department of Health. Some funding for consumables was provided by the European Union through the Special Non-Invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation (SAFE) Network of Excellence.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethical approval: Central office for research ethics committees in the UK.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Accepted 25 February 2008

THIS WEEK'S POLL