- Vidhya Alakeson, Harkness fellow in healthcare policy
- 1Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, USA
- vidhya.alakeson{at}hhs.gov
- Accepted 29 January 2008
As the burden of disease shifts from acute to chronic care, governments are having to reshape health services. The UK health white paper, Our Health, Our Care, Our Say, published in January 2006, outlines four goals: greater prevention and early intervention, more choice and a louder voice for patients, more support for people with long term needs, and tackling inequalities. Other countries in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development have stated similar objectives. If governments are serious about these aims, they would do well to learn from recent innovation in social care. In the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States, and Germany, the delivery of social care services is being transformed through the introduction of individualised funding mechanisms, such as direct payments and individual budgets. These mechanisms allow services to be more accurately tailored to individual needs and could particularly benefit patients needing long term health care.
UK social care experience
The UK introduced direct payments for social care in 1996 for disabled adults above the age of 16 years, elderly people, and carers of disabled children.1 The value of a direct payment can vary from a few thousand pounds to over one hundred thousand pounds depending on the severity of the person’s needs.2 Thirteen local authorities are piloting individual budgets, which go a step further towards integrating support for people needing long term care by combining six different funding streams into one budget, with the exception of NHS funding.3
Direct payments and individual budgets operate slightly differently, but the basic approach is the same: instead of receiving services organised and provided by …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012