This article has a correction
Please see: Public-private partnership in cord blood banking
- Nicholas M Fisk, professor of obstetrics and fetal medicine 1,
- Rifat Atun, professor of international health management2
- 1Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN
- 2Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ
- Correspondence to: N M Fisk nfisk{at}uq.edu.au
- Accepted 3 January 2008
Cord blood is usually discarded at birth but is rich in haemopoietic stem cells, which are increasingly used as an alternative to bone marrow for transplantation. Umbilical blood may also contain mesenchymal stem cells, which in future might be used to repair damaged tissues in a range of diseases such as strokes, heart attacks, renal failure, and diabetes.
Many countries established altruistic public banks of cord blood in response to the increasing need for haemopoietic stem cells for patients with leukaemia and genetic conditions.1 2 3 The limited coverage of these banks, together with the future potential for stem cell cures, led to the introduction of private autologous banking of both haemopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells from cord blood. However, many health professionals oppose private banking because of its speculative and commercial nature. Consumers face an array of providers with conflicting information on the usefulness of banked cord blood. We analyse the growing cord blood banking industry in the UK and the potential impact of Virgin Health Bank’s novel model that provides blood for both personal use and public banks.
Public banks and unmet need
Under the public system parents altruistically donate umbilical cord blood at birth for storage in case a tissue matched patient, usually a child, requires a haemopoietic stem cell transplant. Globally, over 300 000 cord blood samples have been stored and are available for use in a way similar to bone marrow through international registries (www.bmdw.org). Cord blood does not require as close HLA matching as bone marrow, important for the 15-40% of people who have no suitable match in the marrow registries.
The value of public banks is now well …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27