- Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
- 1London
- geoff{at}scileg.freeserve.co.uk
As even the keenest supporters of the European Union might concede, there is not too often reason to use the words “excitement” and “European Commission” in the same sentence. Yet almost all of the people I talked to when researching this article on one of the commission’s latest plans used the word “exciting” when discussing its core proposals.
The project generating this unexpected enthusiasm is the Innovative Medicines Initiative, which was given the final go ahead last December. For a succinct summary of what prompted the initiative, look no further than the 2007 edition of The Pharmaceutical Industry in Figures.1 Speaking of drug industry investment in Europe it says: “Between 1990 and 2006, R&D [research and development] investment in the United States grew 5 times while in Europe it only grew 2.9 times . . . The current tendency to close R&D sites in Europe and to open new sites in Asia will show dramatic effects in the next few years if nothing is done to maintain pharmaceutical discovery expertise in the EU.”
This is the problem that the new initiative seeks to tackle. Or, more accurately, the problem as the drug industry sees it. The commission—coauthor of the policy songsheet from which both groups are now singing—has a slightly less commercial perspective on future threats and possibilities. No matter. The two are in harmony over what needs to be done. So what is the Innovative Medicines Initiative? And how is it supposed to boost drug development in Europe?
Smoothing the research path
Octavi Quintana, head of the EU’s health research directorate, summarises the initiative as a streamlining policy that encourages drug companies to work with each other and …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012