- Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
- 1London
- geoff{at}scileg.freeserve.co.uk
As even the keenest supporters of the European Union might concede, there is not too often reason to use the words “excitement” and “European Commission” in the same sentence. Yet almost all of the people I talked to when researching this article on one of the commission’s latest plans used the word “exciting” when discussing its core proposals.
The project generating this unexpected enthusiasm is the Innovative Medicines Initiative, which was given the final go ahead last December. For a succinct summary of what prompted the initiative, look no further than the 2007 edition of The Pharmaceutical Industry in Figures.1 Speaking of drug industry investment in Europe it says: “Between 1990 and 2006, R&D [research and development] investment in the United States grew 5 times while in Europe it only grew 2.9 times . . . The current tendency to close R&D sites in Europe and to open new sites in Asia will show dramatic effects in the next few years if nothing is done to maintain pharmaceutical discovery expertise in the EU.”
This is the problem that the new initiative seeks to tackle. Or, more accurately, the problem as the drug industry sees it. The commission—coauthor of the policy songsheet from which both groups are now singing—has a slightly less commercial perspective on future threats and possibilities. No matter. The two are in harmony over what needs to be done. So what is the Innovative Medicines Initiative? And how is it supposed to boost drug development in Europe?
Smoothing the research path
Octavi Quintana, head of the EU’s health research directorate, summarises the initiative as a streamlining policy that encourages drug companies to work with each other and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27