- Michael Cross, freelance journalist
- 1London
- michaelcross{at}fastmail.fm
“Three years in the firing line” is how Mike Pringle describes his time leading the world’s largest information technology (IT) programme’s belated attempt to win NHS clinicians’ hearts and minds. As one of seven clinical leads for the NHS in England’s national programme for IT, Pringle, professor of general practice at the University of Nottingham, was the focus of professional opposition to government plans to make patients’ electronic health records accessible throughout the NHS. He has no regrets. Although critical of the way the programme was originally set up, he remains convinced it is the right thing to do.
Sceptics, however, who include both main opposition political parties, are likely to seize on his criticisms in an increasingly charged debate over “big brother” government databases.
Unlike several of the programme’s leading figures, recruited from management consultancies rather than the NHS, Pringle was already known in the healthcare informatics community when he signed up. He has been an IT enthusiast since the 1980s, when his Newark practice was one of the first to be computerised. As a former chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, he was also steeped in NHS politics.
Unlike some of his predecessors, Pringle stayed the course. “We were the fourth attempt at clinical engagement,” he says. The seven clinical leads were recruited in 2004 after three previous clinical directors had come and gone in less than three years. One consequence of the turnover was what Pringle describes as “a detachment” between the IT programme and health professionals.
Connecting with general practice
The seeds were sown at the outset, when the programme was conceived after the 2002 Wanless review of NHS funding. “It was originally seen as a contracting process. That’s …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012