Letters Double blind peer review

Response rate was only 7.7%

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39486.496146.3A (Published 14 February 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:346
  1. Anne Szarewski, clinical consultant
  1. 1Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London EC1M 6BQ
  1. anne.szarewski{at}cancer.org.uk

    I am very surprised at both the headline and the way in which this survey of double blind …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe