- Timothy R J Nicholson, specialist registrar in psychiatry 1,
- William Cutter, consultant psychiatrist 2,
- Matthew Hotopf, professor of general hospital psychiatry1
- 1Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Western Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ
- 2Directorate of Older Persons’ Mental Health Services, Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust, Southampton, Hampshire SO40 2RZ
- Correspondence to: M Hotopf m.hotopf{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
- Accepted 28 November 2007
Summary points
-
The Mental Capacity Act has resulted in increased formalisation of capacity law and assessment
-
The act has increased the expectation that healthcare workers should be competent at assessing capacity
-
The act has also increased the need for training and education, especially awareness and understanding of the code of practice, independent mental capacity advocates, and advance decisions
Clinicians are often confronted with decisions about mental capacity. Healthcare workers in England and Wales should therefore be aware of the recent changes to how capacity is assessed and the way that adults lacking capacity are dealt with since the implementation in 2007 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.1
What does the Mental Capacity Act do?
The act protects people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions. Until the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was implemented no statutory law covered this area. Courts previously dealt with capacity under “common law,” which consists of the accumulated judgments of individual cases. The Mental Capacity Act is underpinned by five key principles (box 1), which are illustrated in a hypothetical scenario (box 2).
Box 1: Five key principles of the Mental Capacity Act
-
Principle 1: Capacity should always be assumed. A patient’s diagnosis, behaviour, or appearance should not lead you to presume capacity is absent
-
Principle 2: A person’s ability to make decisions must be optimised before concluding that capacity is absent. All practicable steps must be taken, such as giving sufficient time for assessments; repeating assessments if capacity is fluctuating; and, if relevant, using interpreters, sign language, or pictures
-
Principle 3: Patients are entitled to make unwise decisions. It is not the decision but the process by which it is reached that determines if capacity is absent
-
Principle 4: Decisions (and actions) made for people lacking capacity must …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012