- Timothy R J Nicholson, specialist registrar in psychiatry 1,
- William Cutter, consultant psychiatrist 2,
- Matthew Hotopf, professor of general hospital psychiatry1
- 1Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Western Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ
- 2Directorate of Older Persons’ Mental Health Services, Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust, Southampton, Hampshire SO40 2RZ
- Correspondence to: M Hotopf m.hotopf{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
- Accepted 28 November 2007
Summary points
-
The Mental Capacity Act has resulted in increased formalisation of capacity law and assessment
-
The act has increased the expectation that healthcare workers should be competent at assessing capacity
-
The act has also increased the need for training and education, especially awareness and understanding of the code of practice, independent mental capacity advocates, and advance decisions
Clinicians are often confronted with decisions about mental capacity. Healthcare workers in England and Wales should therefore be aware of the recent changes to how capacity is assessed and the way that adults lacking capacity are dealt with since the implementation in 2007 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.1
What does the Mental Capacity Act do?
The act protects people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions. Until the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was implemented no statutory law covered this area. Courts previously dealt with capacity under “common law,” which consists of the accumulated judgments of individual cases. The Mental Capacity Act is underpinned by five key principles (box 1), which are illustrated in a hypothetical scenario (box 2).
Box 1: Five key principles of the Mental Capacity Act
-
Principle 1: Capacity should always be assumed. A patient’s diagnosis, behaviour, or appearance should not lead you to presume capacity is absent
-
Principle 2: A person’s ability to make decisions must be optimised before concluding that capacity is absent. All practicable steps must be taken, such as giving sufficient time for assessments; repeating assessments if capacity is fluctuating; and, if relevant, using interpreters, sign language, or pictures
-
Principle 3: Patients are entitled to make unwise decisions. It is not the decision but the process by which it is reached that determines if capacity is absent
-
Principle 4: Decisions (and actions) made for people lacking capacity must …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27