- Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, professor of general practice1,
- Andreas Sönnichsen, professor of general practice2
- 1Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
- 2Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Prevention, Paracelsus Medical University, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
- norbert{at}med.uni-marburg.de
Five years ago the “fire and forget approach” was proposed as a strategy for prescribing lipid lowering drugs.1 It involves prescribing a standard dose of statins to patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease without further testing or dose adjustment. This strategy was contrasted to the “treat to target strategy,” which aims to achieve target concentrations of low density lipoprotein by titrating drugs and other measures accordingly.
Since then, several trials have shown that high dose statins in a supposed treat to target approach are more effective than the standard dose. Accordingly, the United Kingdom quality and outcomes framework and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guideline number 97 emphasise the importance of measuring cholesterol and having targets.2 So, is the treat to target strategy now the best option?
None of the large statin trials used the treat to target strategy suggested by most lipid experts, and none was based on the targets suggested by current guidelines.3 They either used a fixed dose of statin throughout or made only minimal adjustments. Even the recent trials of high …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27