This article has a correction
Please see: Safer by design
- Alison Tonks, associate editor
- 1BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
- atonks{at}bmj.com
While a badly designed chair might be a little uncomfortable, and a badly designed oven might test your ability to turn out evenly browned cakes, a badly designed piece of hospital equipment can kill you. In 2001, Wayne Jowett, a leukaemia patient in a UK hospital, died from an intrathecal injection of the intravenous drug vincristine. Intravenous and intraspinal connections were, and still are, interchangeable—a fundamental design flaw according to the chairman of the subsequent external inquiry.1 A similar design flaw contributed to the death in 2004 of a new mother who was given a bolus of bupivacaine intravenously instead of into her epidural catheter.2
In 2003, 16 year old Natalie Dibden died of a head injury soon after falling out of a badly designed ambulance.3 4 These tragedies and many others would never have happened in a world where hospitals, equipment, drug packaging and information, computer systems, and patient transport were specifically designed to prevent them—to protect patients from every conceivable harm, and particularly from human error. Cars, nuclear power stations, and aeroplanes are designed to be safe. They have to be. Rather belatedly, healthcare authorities all over the world are starting to learn from these industries and to think seriously about how good design can save lives.
Starting from scratch
It could be a long hard slog, according to a 2003 joint report by the Department of Health and the Design Council.[5 ] The report concluded that the NHS was complex, chaotic, and clueless about design.
“The NHS is seriously out of step with modern thinking and practice with regard to design. A consequence of this has been a significant incidence …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012