- Ian Roberts, professor of epidemiology and public health
- 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Tony Blair welcomed the publication of the Stern review on the economics of climate change calling it a wake up call to the world.1 Its message was clear. The costs of taking action to stabilise the climate will be high but much less than the costs of inaction. Delay would be dangerous. Action is needed now. The review also exposed the economic cause of climate change. Climate change is market failure on the greatest scale the world has ever seen.1
Markets fail to provide the right quantity of goods and services when important costs are left out of our private economic decision making. In general, the extent to which people engage in activities that result in the emission of greenhouse gases depends on the cost of those activities. For example, when deciding whether to travel by car we might consider the cost of the time, petrol, parking, and wear and tear on the vehicle. Londoners might include the congestion charge, but few people would take into account the costs to the world and future generations of the emissions that their journey will produce. Costs on others that do not (without public action) …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27