- Lynn Eaton
- 1London
GPs’ leaders have found themselves fighting back over plans—stemming from 10 Downing Street—to force general practices to open for longer. The government said just before Christmas that it intended to impose a contract on GPs that could mean that practices that don’t comply will lose as much as £36 000 (€49 000; $72 000) a year.
The BMA leaders argue that the proposals don’t reflect what most patients want and that doctors will be too tired to provide a good service.
At a briefing just before Christmas, Laurence Buckman, chairman of the BMA’s General Practitioners Committee, told journalists that the government had “effectively put a gun to our head.”
He said, “We are being bullied so that the prime minister can tick …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27