- Michael Buist, intensive care director 1,
- Julia Harrison, staff specialist1,
- Ellie Abaloz, nurse unit manager 1,
- Susan Van Dyke, quality manager
- Correspondence to: M Buist mbuist{at}patientrack.com
- Accepted 10 October 2007
Abstract
Problem In-hospital cardiac arrest often represents failure of optimal clinical care. The use of medical emergency teams to prevent such events is controversial. In-hospital cardiac arrests have been reduced in several single centre historical control studies, but the only randomised prospective study showed no such benefit. In our hospital an important problem was failure to call the medical emergency team or cardiac arrest team when, before in-hospital cardiac arrest, patients had fulfilled the criteria for calling the team.
Design Single centre, prospective audit of cardiac arrests and data on use of the medical emergency team during 2000 to 2005.
Setting 400 bed general outer suburban metropolitan teaching hospital.
Strategies for change Three initiatives in the hospital to improve use of the medical emergency team: orientation programme for first year doctors, professional development course for medical registrars, and the evolving role of liaison intensive care unit nurses.
Key measures for improvement Incidence of cardiac arrests.
Effects of the change Incidence of cardiac arrests decreased 24% per year, from 2.4/1000 admissions in 2000 to 0.66/1000 admissions in 2005.
Lessons learnt Medical emergency teams can be efficacious when supported with a multidisciplinary, multifaceted education system for clinical staff.
Footnotes
Contributors: MB has overseen the implementation and development of the medical emergency team, the intern orientation programme, and components of the registrar professional development programme and prepared the manuscript. JH wrote and designed the registrar professional development course. EA developed the nurse liaison programme. SVD designed, developed, and maintained the audit system and database. All authors have contributed to this manuscript and have approved the final version.MB is guarantor.
Funding: No additional funding.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not required
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- Accepted 10 October 2007
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012