PDF
Easy Read
Respond to this article- Versions
- bmj.39385.534236.47v1
- 335/7631/1210 most recent
- Michael Buist, intensive care director 1,
- Julia Harrison, staff specialist1,
- Ellie Abaloz, nurse unit manager 1,
- Susan Van Dyke, quality manager
- Correspondence to: M Buist mbuist{at}patientrack.com
- Accepted 10 October 2007
Abstract
Problem In-hospital cardiac arrest often represents failure of optimal clinical care. The use of medical emergency teams to prevent such events is controversial. In-hospital cardiac arrests have been reduced in several single centre historical control studies, but the only randomised prospective study showed no such benefit. In our hospital an important problem was failure to call the medical emergency team or cardiac arrest team when, before in-hospital cardiac arrest, patients had fulfilled the criteria for calling the team.
Design Single centre, prospective audit of cardiac arrests and data on use of the medical emergency team during 2000 to 2005.
Setting 400 bed general outer suburban metropolitan teaching hospital.
Strategies for change Three initiatives in the hospital to improve use of the medical emergency team: orientation programme for first year doctors, professional development course for medical registrars, and the evolving role of liaison intensive care unit nurses.
Key measures for improvement Incidence of cardiac arrests.
Effects of the change Incidence of cardiac arrests decreased 24% per year, from 2.4/1000 admissions in 2000 to 0.66/1000 admissions in 2005.
Lessons learnt Medical emergency teams can be efficacious when supported with a multidisciplinary, multifaceted education system for clinical staff.
Footnotes
Contributors: MB has overseen the implementation and development of the medical emergency team, the intern orientation programme, and components of the registrar professional development programme and prepared the manuscript. JH wrote and designed the registrar professional development course. EA developed the nurse liaison programme. SVD designed, developed, and maintained the audit system and database. All authors have contributed to this manuscript and have approved the final version.MB is guarantor.
Funding: No additional funding.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not required
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- Accepted 10 October 2007
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27