Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. L A Ratnam, interventional radiology fellow,
  2. S R Nelson, consultant nephrologist,
  3. A M Belli, consultant interventional radiologist
  1. Radiology Department, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT
  1. Correspondence to: A M BelliAnna.Belli{at}stgeorges.nhs.uk

    Diagnosing renal artery stenosis can be difficult. This article explores possible types of imaging for this, ranging from safe, inexpensive tests to more invasive procedures

    Learning points

    • • Renal artery stenosis is a common condition in elderly people presenting with renal impairment and hypertension

    • • Ultrasonography is the first line method of imaging as it is safe, inexpensive, and widely available and readily detects obstructive causes. However, a normal renal ultrasound study does not exclude the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

    • • Magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography are the preferred non-invasive imaging methods to identify renal artery stenosis. Digital subtraction angiography should be reserved for patients in whom endovascular intervention is being considered or when non-invasive imaging is inconclusive

    The patient

    A 79 year old hypertensive man was referred for investigation of impaired renal function. At the time of referral he was taking a single antihypertensive agent and his blood pressure measured 170/85 mm Hg. He smoked 50 g of pipe tobacco a week. He had no other medical history of note. No renal artery bruit was detected, and the remaining clinical examination was unremarkable. His serum creatinine concentration at presentation was 116 mmol/l (normal range 60-110 mmol/l), representing an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 55 ml/min. Urine analysis was normal. His serum cholesterol concentration was raised (5.9 mmol/l (normal range 3.0-5.2 mmol/l). Over two years, his blood pressure remained raised despite an increase in his antihypertensive treatment, and his serum creatinine concentration rose to 206 mmol/l.

    What is the next investigation?

    Unexplained, progressive renal impairment, and hypertension that is poorly controlled despite the use of multiple drugs, warrants further investigation. The absence of blood and protein in the urine points away from intrinsic renal disease. Both a prerenal cause (such as renal artery stenosis) and …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular