Editorials

Defining a high performance healthcare organisation

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39359.605752.80 (Published 22 November 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:1055
  1. Bruce D Agins, medical director,
  2. Marc M Holden, research associate
  1. New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute, New York, NY 10025, USA
  1. bda01{at}health.state.ny.us

    Composite measures of performance are insufficient on their own

    Why are high performing healthcare organisations so hard to find? In this week's BMJ, Wilson and colleagues report a study that evaluates 69 facilities in 30 US states that receive categorical funding for HIV services.1 The authors assessed performance using a bundle of eight clinical measures considered by a panel of experts to represent high quality of care for HIV. They found that few organisations scored highly across more than a handful of measures.

    Interpreting the results at face value suggests that these facilities are not performing well, and that their organisations do not support strong systems of care for people living with HIV. We would expect all clinics to provide comprehensive elements of care that have been shown to improve patients' outcomes. However, closer scrutiny of the study raises methodological and theoretical questions about the selection and measurement of the indicators and, importantly, the association between overall performance and designation as a high performing healthcare organisation.

    Composite measures are commonly used to monitor performance in healthcare systems. An overall score is computed by aggregating each component into a bundle of …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe