Addressing the argumentsBMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39374.421100.BE (Published 25 October 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:841
- Baldwin of Bewdley, Cross bench peer
- House of Lords, London SW1 OPW
Cheng et al1 are well placed to sound cautionary notes about fluoridation as two of the authors were involved in the only scientifically defensible assessment of the evidence so far.2 I also served on the advisory panel to the York review, after two years of parliamentary questioning of the rationale for fluoridation.
It is depressing then to see restatements of old positions, instead of engagement with their …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial