Summary of other responsesBMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39374.627373.BE (Published 25 October 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:839
- Sharon Davies, letters editor
- BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
Westaby et al make a good case for not publishing unreliable outcome data based on hospital episode statistics (HES),1 but they miss what ought to be two important issues, says Stephen Black, a management consultant in London.
The first concerns how statistical information is presented. “Standard practice gives information to the public and to experts in a form almost guaranteed to mislead. This leads to the erroneous conclusion that members of the public can't …