Should general practitioners resume 24 hour responsibility for their patients? YesBMJ 2007; 335 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39350.506991.AD (Published 04 October 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:696
- Roger Jones, Wolfson professor of general practice
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London, London SE11 6SP
New contractual arrangements to encourage practices to opt back in to 24 hour responsibility and to support general practitioners who choose to discharge this responsibility personally would have many benefits. The change would begin to redress the increasing separation of daytime, surgery based care from out of hours care provided by deputising services. These arrangements would also improve general practice training; greatly increase the quality and appropriateness of out of hours care, particularly in terms of hospital admissions and appropriate use of services by patients; and enhance patient safety by improving the communication of important clinical information. They would be widely welcomed not only by patients but also by other sectors of the medical profession, and are also likely to be cost effective.
The background to this debate is the new contract for general practitioners introduced in 2004, which allowed …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Sign up for a free trial