Full houseBMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39353.475706.BE (Published 04 October 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:684
- Jorge Zimbron, academic foundation year 2
- Institute of Psychiatry at the Maudsley, King's College, London SE5 8AF
Winyard argues that the BMA is being “ambiguous” in criticising both the medical training application service (MTAS) fiasco and the changes in immigration policy.1 He implies that it is incongruent to do so, as stopping immigration is necessary for the system to run adequately. Although this is somewhat true, the BMA is not lobbying for the rights of future immigrants, but …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial