Feature Maternity services

How far is too far?

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39344.638623.AD (Published 27 September 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:640
  1. Adrian O'Dowd, freelance journalist
  1. Margate
  1. adrianodowd{at}hotmail.com

    Any change to local hospital services is unlikely to win instant acceptance, but plans to close the obstetric department at an Oxfordshire hospital have stirred up particularly strong feelings, as Adrian O'Dowd reports

    Many acute trusts in England are currently considering reconfiguring some of their services. All over the country battle lines are being drawn as patients and doctors fight to save local hospitals, and in one case the dispute has become so intense that the health secretary has been called in to make a judgment.

    One of several changes proposed by Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust is to close its consultant led obstetrics department at the Horton General Hospital in Banbury and replace it with a midwife led birthing unit, which would be the country's largest such unit. The trust argues that change has come because of long held concerns over the long term safety and sustainability of medical staffing of children's services at the Horton. It claims the changes overall will cost the trust an extra £593 000 (€893 000; $1.2m) annually, alongside a capital programme of £7m investment at the hospital, but those opposed to the changes have questioned the figures and believe cost cutting is playing a part in the trust's motives.

    These plans have led to strong opposition, as shown by a four month consultation held last year, a petition opposing the changes signed by more than 15 000 people, and a statement condemning the move signed by 86 general practitioners. …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe