Letters PRP for GPs

Summary of responses

BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39346.699907.BE (Published 27 September 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:627
  1. Birte Twisselmann, assistant editor, bmj.com
  1. BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
  1. btwisselmann{at}bmj.com

    The editorial by cardiologist David S Wald on performance related pay (PRP) in primary care sparked 12 responses, mostly from aggrieved UK general practitioners (GPs).1 2 United in their opposition to Wald's suggestions for a “revised” quality and outcomes framework (QOF), several of the respondents point out that a hospital consultant may not be best placed to write about issues affecting primary care and the increasing complexity of primary care consultations.

    Many …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe