- Susan Mayor
- London
The complete genome sequence of one person—one of the US biologists working on the project, J Craig Venter—was published for the first time this week. By enabling scientists to compare the contribution of each of the parental chromosomes, it showed that genetic variation among humans was much greater than previously estimated.
The data indicate that variation from human to human is about 0.5% of the genome, not 0.1%, as previously thought.
The new genome, called HuRef (which stands for human reference), is the first time that the full or diploid genome, consisting of the DNA in both sets of chromosomes (one from each parent), has been published for one individual (PLoS Biol 2007;5(10):e244 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050254). Two previous versions of the human genome, published by the Human Genome Sequencing Consortium and by Celera Genomics, were mosaics of DNA sequences from several donors.
Data on more than 20 …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012