Correction to Should folic acid fortification be mandatory? Yes
In both the print and web versions of this Head to Head article by Nicholas J Wald and Godfrey P Oakley (BMJ 2007;334:1252, 16 Jun, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39232.493252.47) the word “deficiency” appears unnecessarily in the discussion of whether folic acid exacerbates B-12 deficiency. The relevant sentence should read: “...high dose folic acid can reverse the arrest of DNA synthesis that causes a B-12 macrocytosis [not B-12 macrocytosis deficiency].”
Also, during editing for the print version, several headings were omitted; readers are advised to consult the full version on bmj.com, which includes headings stating the four concerns that the article rebuts: that folic acid may cause cancer; that randomised trials have shown no benefit in cardiovascular disease; that folic acid may make B-12 deficiency worse; and that folic acid is a form of folate that does not occur in nature.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27