- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- New York
The ease with which a man infected with extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) flew on several international flights exposes flaws in international public health systems. The asymptomatic US lawyer flew on two transatlantic flights and several European flights for his wedding and honeymoon.
It also led to an international search for passengers who may have been exposed to this almost incurable disease.
Local public health officials in the United States could not prevent him from travelling; the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) failed to contact him; a “no fly alert” did not prevent him from flying; and a border alert to detain him was ignored.
The good news, said Julie Gerberding, head of the CDC, was that the risk of transmission was low. The man was “smear negative,” with no detectable bacteria in his sputum.
Mario Raviglione, director of the Stop TB programme at the World Health Organization, told the BMJ that “if the International Health Regulations, 2006, had been in place, the relevant procedures outlined would have been followed correctly. [The regulations] will come into effect on 15 June worldwide and 17 July in the US [United …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27