- Saskia N de Wildt, paediatrician1,
- Ron Verzijden, information technology management consultant2,
- John N van den Anker, neonatologist and clinical pharmacologist3,
- Matthijs de Hoog, paediatric intensivist1
- 1Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GJ
- 2Ron Verzijden Management Consultants, Toronto, Canada M5J 2Y5
- 3Division of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, 20010, USA
- Correspondence to: S N de Wildt, Hospital for Sick Children, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8 s.dewildt{at}erasmusmc.nl
- Accepted 8 January 2007
Information technology tools, such as those used to calculate drug doses and infusion rates, can help reduce adverse events and prevent errors.1 Drug dosages for children are usually calculated on the basis of weight. Calculations are especially prone to error and delay in crisis situations such as resuscitation. In such settings, computer based tools may improve clinical care, although human error can still occur, as illustrated by this case report.
Case report
A 3 month old infant who arrived at the emergency department of a small regional hospital had clinical signs of meningococcal sepsis with petechiae, purpura, and shock. The infant was subsequently transferred to our paediatric intensive care unit. During transfer the patient was given infusions of dobutamine and noradrenaline by the transferring intensivist. The concentrations of 12 drugs that might be needed for infusion during transport had previously been calculated in the intensive care unit by the resident. This had been done by entering the patient's weight into a preprogrammed PocketExcel sheet for a personal digital assistant (handheld computer).
When the patient arrived at the unit all running drugs were ordered using our electronic patient data management system (a bedside computer application). This system uses the patient's weight and the desired infusion rate …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27