Editorials

Stockpiling smallpox virus

BMJ 2007; 334 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39177.580729.BE (Published 12 April 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:760
  1. Thomas Mack, professor of preventive medicine
  1. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
  1. mack{at}ccnt.usc.edu

    Other viruses pose greater public health threats, so isn't it time to move on?

    Emotions still run high over the stocks of smallpox virus placed into the P4 freezers of Atlanta and Novosibirsk more than 30 years ago by the World Health Organization. In this week's BMJ, two articles present opposing views on whether the United States and Russia should destroy their stocks of smallpox virus (Variola).1 2

    One argument for maintaining smallpox stocks is that they are needed to develop safer vaccines.1 Our current effective vaccine is safe when used judiciously—not for mass vaccination of populations, but for targeting those at risk after screening out people with a history of HIV, leukaemia, or eczema at higher risk of complications after vaccination.3 Moreover, new vaccines are based on Vaccinia, not smallpox.4 No new vaccine can be tested for efficacy until human cases of smallpox reappear.

    Another argument is that smallpox stocks are needed to assess antiviral agents for the treatment of smallpox. Again, no agent can be properly tested until human cases reappear. …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe