Letters Cord clamping

NICE is encouraging artificial intervention

BMJ 2007; 334 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39164.428843.1F (Published 29 March 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:651
  1. David J R Hutchon, consultant obstetrician (djrhutchon{at}postmaster.co.uk)
  1. Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington DL3 6HX

    As well as seeming to discourage the detection of postpartum depression,1 the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is also encouraging the artificial intervention of immediate cord clamping.2

    The NICE guideline for caesarean section includes a section on cord clamping. It states a number of “suggested” benefits and a number of “possible” harms. The reference is a review paper in a midwifery journal.3 This review clearly provides evidence for the benefits, not simply a “suggestion,” and clearly disputes any evidence of harm from polycythemia, hyperviscosity, or hyperbilirubinaemia..

    The NICE draft guideline on intrapartum care never mentions cord clamping (www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=334322). The authors recognise that the major rapid physiological changes that take place enable the baby to adapt to life outside the womb. How rapidly should we expect these changes to take place? Is it reasonable to expect these physiological changes to occur within a few seconds and at the whim of a bystander? Active management of the third stage is considered to be an established part of good intrapartum care, and early cord clamping an integral part of it.4

    How precise does the practice need to be? The timing of the oxytocic agent varies among the studies and in different parts of the world. There is no real logic for incorporating early cord clamping in a strategy to reduce post-partum haemorrhage. Removing the clamp and draining the residual placental blood seems to shorten the third stage.3 This is recommended practice in rhesus negative women, in an effort to reduce the risk of fetomaternal haemorrhage.5 It is therefore totally illogical to recommend immediate cord clamping and cutting, followed by drainage of the residual placental blood. This is blood that is physiogically required by the newborn baby. It would be better to “drain the placenta” into the newborn baby or at least provide the baby with the amount of blood that it requires. Any residual blood at that stage can be allowed to drain away.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    References

    View Abstract

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe