- A John Camm, British Heart Foundation professor of clinical cardiology,
- Irina Savelieva, senior research fellow
- St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE
- Correspondence to: A J Camm, Division of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0REjcamm@sgul.ac.uk
The clinical problem
Atrial fibrillation affects up to 1.5% of the population in the United Kingdom,1 about 200 000 of whom have recurrent episodes. Although such episodes often resolve spontaneously and within 48 hours,2 patients may be distressed by symptoms of palpitations, dizziness, fatigue, or chest pain. Such attacks generally respond to antiarrhythmic agents (such as a single intravenous dose of propafenone or flecainide),3 which are usually administered under monitoring in hospital.
Here we propose that patients could self treat with oral propafenone or flecainide, using a “pill in the pocket” approach (thereby not needing to go to hospital), as suggested in recent national (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) and international guidelines.4 5 For details of our methods, please see the box on bmj.com.
KEY POINTS
• Currently, patients without severe heart disease who have infrequent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation require hospital intervention for symptomatic episodes
• For selected patients, self treatment strategy is feasible, safe, and reduces hospital admissions and emergency department visits
• Eligible patients should not have a history of left ventricular dysfunction and should not have valvular or ischaemic heart disease, and they should have a history of infrequent symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
• They should first be treated for symptoms at a specialist hospital unit, using oral flecainide or propafenone; if successful, the drug can be carried by the patient for self treatment when symptoms occur
Methods
Our proposal is based on:
• Systematic reviews showing that atrial …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Darwin’s illness revisited
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (6 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012