- Zosia Kmietowicz
- London
A review by MPs of proposals on how £1bn (€1.5bn; $1.9bn) worth of publicly funded health research should be allocated in the United Kingdom has raised concerns about introducing targets to set research priorities.
The cross party Science and Technology Committee has broadly welcomed the conclusions reached by Sir David Cooksey in his review published in December (BMJ 2006;333:1239, 16 Dec, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39059.559213.DB) on how healthcare research can be improved to bring more tangible benefits to patients.
The committee says it has reservations about some aspects of the proposals, however, and will be taking “a close interest in reviewing progress and how the new institutional arrangements will work in practice.”
In …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27