Menu

 

Analysis

When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise

BMJ 2007; 334 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39070.527986.68 (Published 15 February 2007)
Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:349

Related articles

Editorial: Why do the results of randomised and observational studies differ?

Published 7 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7020

Research methods and reporting: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

Published 29 September 2008; BMJ 337 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655

Analysis: What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

Published 1 May 2008; BMJ 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE

Correction: When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise

Published 22 March 2007; BMJ 334 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39161.547882.BE

Letter: Beware the “Texas sharp shooter” in rate ratios of progression

Published 1 March 2007; BMJ 334 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39136.475313.FA

Letter: The urge to sprinkle statistics is irresistible

Published 1 March 2007; BMJ 334 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39136.470139.FA

Editor's Choice: Controversies revisited

Published 15 February 2007; BMJ 334 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39126.301019.3B

Education and debate: Money can't buy you satisfaction

Published 10 March 2005; BMJ 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.597

Education and debate: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Published 17 June 2004; BMJ 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

Data supplement

References

Published

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls