Letters Cervical screening

Women under 25 should be offered screening

BMJ 2007; 334 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39115.406771.1F (Published 08 February 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:273
  1. Amanda Herbert, consultant histopathologist and cytopathologist1,
  2. John H F Smith, consultant histopathologist and cytopathologist2
  1. 1Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH amanda.herbert@kcl.ac.uk
  2. 2Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF

    There may be several reasons why cervical screening coverage in young women has fallen yet again, including problems with access to appointments with general practitioners, but the new policy not to screen women aged 20-24 can hardly have helped.1 It was announced with the message that screening that age group caused more harm than good, which is unlikely to encourage them to accept their invitations from age 25. Prevalence of carcinoma in situ (CIN3) has increased in women aged 20-24 (figure), which is consistent with more women in recent birth cohorts starting sexual activity in their mid-teens.

    Figure

    The new policy will add more than 3000 women with untreated CIN3 to the larger numbers failing to accept their invitations later on. We accept that any degree of CIN may regress, invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is rare in women under 25, and screening does little to reduce its incidence in such young women. However, ICC can develop within a couple of years of missed high-grade cytology, failure to investigate cytological abnormalities, or incomplete treatment,2 emphasising the importance of treating high-grade CIN when it is found.

    Screening in the UK has been highly successful since it was centrally organised in 1988: incidence and mortality have fallen by more than 40% despiteincreased risk of disease.3 This has been achieved by treating high-grade CIN, particularly CIN3, in young women. The peak prevalence of CIN3 is in women aged 25-29 amongst whom the fall in coverage has been greatest.

    ICC is more difficult to prevent in young women because there are less screening opportunities to treat these lesions before they become invasive.4 The peak incidence of ICC in the screening age groups is now in women aged 35-39. Most of these cancers are detected by screening at an early and treatable stage.4

    Decisions about treatment of CIN should be based on a balance between risk of progression, likelihood of regression and risk of treatment.5 Women should be informed about the risk of high-grade CIN, its greater frequency in young women, the importance of surveillance of low grade abnormalities and the fact that an epidemic of cervical cancer has been prevented by screening women when they were young.2 General practitioners and clinics should not be prevented from screening women whom they believe to be at risk if those women themselves want to be screened.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    References

    View Abstract

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Subscribe