- Joan Higgins, emerita professor of health policy
- 1University of Manchester, Manchester
- Withington, Manchester M20 3LD joan.higgins{at}manchester.ac.uk
- Accepted 30 October 2006
The NHS is being restructured to make health service commissioning the engine of change. However, the model that has been developed builds on a legacy of weak incentives and lack of imagination. It has focused on modifying existing organisations and changing boundaries based on geography. It does not tackle the fundamental flaws inherent in the system created in the 1990s or respond to some key questions that most other healthcare systems have confronted over the past 70 years. This paper challenges the basis on which the NHS is developing commissioning and suggests five areas for further thinking.
Current strategy
The annex to Health Reform in England: update and commissioning framework 1 published in July 2006 sets out the vision for commissioning in England over the next few years. Although some new techniques are proposed, the plans described are essentially more of the same and provide little reassurance that commissioning really will be given the levers to secure appreciable improvements in health or health services. Five assumptions in the current thinking need to be challenged:
-
That patient choice should primarily be about choice of provider rather than commissioner
-
That commissioning organisations need to be defined by geography and resident population
-
That purchasers can and should commission on a population basis rather than on behalf of individuals
-
That general practitioners and primary care trusts should be the only commissioners and that delegating commissioning functions to other organisations necessarily means privatising commissioning
-
That developing specialised commissioning organisations would undermine the commitment to a tax funded NHS and pave the way for an insurance based model.
Choice of provider or commissioner?
The original idea for a purchaser-provider split in the NHS came from Alain Enthoven in 1985.2 He argued that …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27