High court upholds General Medical Council's rejection of case against neurologistBMJ 2007; 334 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39084.423657.DB (Published 04 January 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;334:12
- Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
The General Medical Council has comprehensively defeated a challenge in the High Court by the Singapore Medical Council to the GMC's decision to drop a disciplinary case against the British neurologist Simon Shorvon over a research project he headed in Singapore (BMJ 2003;326:839).
The Singapore council found Professor Shorvon guilty of serious professional misconduct in 2004 over the $S10m (£3.3m; €5m; $6.5m) project, which was halted amid allegations that researchers breached confidentiality, failed to obtain informed consent, and disregarded the best interests of vulnerable patients.
The GMC, which was originally alerted to the allegations by an article in the Guardian newspaper in January 2003 (www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,878047,00.html), started investigating possible disciplinary action. But when the case reached the investigation committee of the fitness to practice panel, …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial