Editorial was confusing
- Mark J Bolland (m.bolland@auckland.ac.nz),
- Andrew Grey, associate professor of medicine,
- Ian R Reid, professor of medicine
- 1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
The recent editorial by Landis et al has added confusion rather than clarity to the issue of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in association with the use of bisphosphonates.1 They do not distinguish between the use of very high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates (monthly pamidronate or zoledronate) to treat patients with malignancy, and the use of much lower doses of bisphosphonates (approximately 1/12 of the oncology dose) in the treatment of Paget's disease or osteoporosis. These two different uses of bisphosphonates have been associated with different risks …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27