- Zosia Kmietowicz
- 1London
The BMA has rejected some of the key proposals put forward by England's chief medical officer to change the way doctors are regulated. The BMA describes Liam Donaldson's report Good Doctors, Safer Patients, which was published in July (BMJ 2006;333:163), as a “missed opportunity” that has failed to gauge the mood of the profession and its commitment to change.
In particular the BMA opposes the report's proposal to lower the standard of proof needed to strike off a doctor from the criminal one of “beyond all reasonable doubt” to the civil standard of “balance of probability.”
James Johnson, chairman of the BMA, said: “We welcome several of the chief medical officer's recommendations, particularly those that move towards supporting doctors with performance problems. Other recommendations we …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27