- Marc Suhrcke, economist1,
- Martin McKee, professor of European public health2,
- Regina Sauto Arce, research fellow3,
- Svetla Tsolova, research fellow3,
- Jørgen Mortensen, associate senior research fellow3
- 1European Office for Investment for Health and Development, World Health Organization, Venice, Italy
- 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT
- 3Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence to: M McKee martin.mckee{at}lshtm.ac.uk
- Accepted 14 August 2006
Five years ago, the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health concluded that ill health was contributing to the low level of economic growth in poor countries.1 The landmark report showed that investment in some basic health interventions would lead to substantial economic growth.1 However, the commission did not look at rich countries, where the situation is quite different. Production in poor countries—for example, from agriculture and mining—is much more obviously affected by physical wellbeing. In addition, the measures to improve health in poor countries, such as immunisation and access to essential drugs, are less complex than those needed to manage the large burden of non-communicable disease in rich countries. Understanding the role of health as a driver of economic growth in Europe is important, given the stated commitment of Europe's governments in March 2000 to make Europe the most competitive and dynamic knowledge driven economy by 2010.
In this article we summarise the findings of a study that we did for the European Commission examining the link between health and wealth in rich countries. The full report has been published elsewhere,2 and a summary of the methods is available on bmj.com.
How might health affect the economy?
Healthier individuals might affect the economy in four ways:3
-
They might be more productive at work and so earn higher incomes
-
They may spend more time in the labour force, as less healthy people take sickness absence or retire early
-
They may invest more in their own education, which will increase their productivity
-
They may save more in expectation of a longer life—for example, for retirement—increasing the funds available for investment in the economy.
It is not straightforward to …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27