- Leroy C Edozien (Leroy.Edozien@cmmc.nhs.uk), consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist1
- 1 St Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 0JH
- Accepted 28 July 2006
Increasing numbers of women in maternity units across the United Kingdom are requesting collection of umbilical cord blood at delivery to enable storage of stem cells for possible autologous transfusion in the future. Such commercial banking of cord blood has important implications for National Health Service maternity units. The debate on whether commercial cord blood banking should be encouraged has mostly been limited to the scientific merits, but risk management, medicolegal, and ethical issues also need considering.
Growth of blood banking
Umbilical cord blood is rich in stem cells that can be used to treat patients with abnormal haematopoietic cell lines, childhood leukaemia, or metabolic diseases.1 Bone marrow is used for this purpose, but cord blood is cheaper and easier to obtain and less likely to trigger a harmful immune response or rejection in the recipient.2
For these reasons interest has been growing in banking cord blood. The collected sample is commercially processed and stored for possible autologous transfusion in the future, a practice commonly referred to as biological insurance.
Media hype about the potential of stem cell transplantation3 and marketing by the commercial cord blood banks are likely to increase requests for blood collection at delivery. These banks advertise on the internet, distribute literature in antenatal clinics, and directly approach doctors and midwives.
A booklet distributed by one of the commercial banks tells potential clients that, “The cure for many life threatening diseases is dependent on the transplantation of stem cells.”4 It speaks of “unimaginable possibilities” and states: “Potentially [stem cell] research should provide answers to curing diseases such as diabetes, breast cancer, ovarian or testicular cancer, melanoma, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012