Morbidity and mortality after emergency surgery

BMJ 2006; 333 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38922.502361.80 (Published 5 October 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;333:713

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Craig Morris, consultant in intensive care medicine and anaesthesia (cmorris@doctors.org.uk),
  2. Conn Russell, consultant in intensive care medicine and anaesthesia
  1. Ulster Hospital, Belfast BT16 1RH
  2. Ulster Hospital, Belfast BT16 1RH

    Quality measures and performance indicators may reduce this toll

    Patients who have emergency surgery, especially those with comorbidities, have a high risk of adverse outcomes. Of 20 000 reported surgical deaths, most occurred within days of emergency or major surgery.1 Pneumonia was the most common cause of death (www.ncepod.org.uk/pdf/200304DeathData.pdf), and suggests that organ (lung) failure can progress rapidly in susceptible people.

    Recent initiatives, such as the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Deaths (under the auspices of the Patients Safety Agency), aim to reduce morbidity and mortality after emergency surgery. The multidisciplinary Improving Surgical Outcomes Group has also released a document with the same aims.2 It describes system changes (such as better preoperative assessment) and interventions (such as non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output3) that will help patients reach the far end of their “surgical journey” alive and well.

    Current systems for assessing risk preoperatively are of variable effectiveness. Traditional clerking often fails to prioritise resuscitation and physiological stabilisation (correction of organ dysfunction and biochemical …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL