- Swaran P Singh (S.P.Singh@warwick.ac.uk), professor of social and community psychiatry1,
- Tom Burns, professor of social psychiatry2
- 1 Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL,
- 2University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
- Correspondence to: S P Singh
- Accepted 5 July 2006
It occurred to me that there was no difference between men, in intelligence or race, so profound as the difference between the sick and the well.
F Scott Fitzgerald. The Great Gatsby. 1925
The “Count me in” census for England and Wales showed higher rates of admission for mental illness and more adverse pathways to care for some black and minority ethnic groups and produced predictable accusations of institutional racism within psychiatry.1 Lee Jasper, chair of African and Caribbean Mental Health, stated: “This census confirms once and for all that mental health services are institutionally racist and overwhelmingly discriminatory. They are more about criminalising our community than caring for it.”2 In fact, the census clearly states that it “highlights the differences between various black and minority ethnic groups and the need to avoid generalisations about these groups. It does not show a failure in the services” (page 7) and comments that “although many possible explanations have been put forward for these patterns, the evidence is inconclusive” (page 27). Not surprisingly it was the accusation of institutional racism, described as a “festering abscess within the NHS,”2 that made the headlines. Mr Jaspers is not alone in expressing such concerns. Several reports and inquiries have also alleged that psychiatry is institutionally racist.3–6 What then, is the evidence that the census findings can be attributed to racism within psychiatry?
Rates of mental illness in minority groups
High rates of mental illness in migrant groups have been recognised and speculated on throughout the past century. A scientific approach to understanding the issue originated with Odegaard's observation of raised rates in Norwegian immigrants in …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012